Ostrem v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the district court's denial of a motion to amend was not an abuse of discretion after examination of the verdict form and instructions to determine jury's intent
• explaining the court takes a “pragmatic view” to rule 1.924 and holding error is preserved where the instruction was requested or objection made, the point of law or question of fact was explained, and the district court ruled upon the matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).