Osthus v. Countrylane Woods II Homeowners Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that costs for replacing lines damaged by a third party were not eligible for recovery under ISRS
• holding that costs for replacing lines damaged by a third party were not eligible for recovery under ISRS
• holding that replacement of components damaged by a third party's negligence is not encompassed by the statute
• holding that utility plant projects which were damaged by a third party’s negligence are not eligible for an ISRS surcharge because such damage is not from structures being worn out or deteriorated
• stating that the legislative intent is \demonstrated by the plain language of the statute\
• clarifying that a replacement project is only ISRS-eligible under section 393.1009.5(a) when the replaced infrastructure has become deteriorated through “a gradual process that happens over a period of time rather than an immediate event.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).