Oster's Exor. v. Ohlman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing a Monell claim against the city where the complaint included no facts supporting allegations that the city inadequately trained and supervised officers
• dismissing a Monell claim against the city where the complaint included no facts supporting allegations that the city inadequately trained and supervised officers
• explaining failure to intervene claims are not limited to the excessive force context
• “If an officer witnesses unconstitutional conduct, and fails to intervene, he is liable under Section 1983. . . . And any reasonable officer would therefore have known that failing to intervene when his fellow officer executed a false arrest was also unconstitutional.”
• “while allegations regarding a ‘code of silence’ among police officers may support a Monell claim, here, the only factual allegation is that there is, and has been, a ‘code of silence’ among police officers to conceal unconstitutional conduct, and that alone is not enough”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).