Skip to main content
· 12/21/1993

Ostermueller v. Potter

Citations

  • 868 S.W.2d 110
  • 1993 Mo. LEXIS 117
  • 1993 WL 525014

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • filing of action within limitations period tolls statute of limitation without regard to service
  • “[D]ue diligence in effecting service of process in the first suit” is not necessary to invoke the savings statute.
  • “Supreme Court rules govern over contradictory statutes in procedural matters unless the General Assembly specifically annuls or amends the rules in a bill limited to that purpose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Covington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.