Osterman v. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[p]ost–Rash case law suggests that Rash can be applied to the provisions of all three reorganization chapters—11, 12, and 13—because these chapters all treat secured claims similarly”
• “The Court can easily see uses for the ‘value in use’ mechanism . . . where the property has not been subjected to a sale process (especially one subject to higher and better offers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).