Osterburg v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, because the petitioner who challenges a later sentence enhancement is no longer in custody on the initial flawed conviction, the state rendering that initial conviction \has extracted its punishment and has no further interest in petitioner\
• stating that if the challenged prior conviction is indeed flawed, the appropriate remedy shall be a remand to the Parole Commission for a recomputation of the petitioner's parole eligibility on the later offense without consideration of the challenged conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).