Ostensen v. Suffolk County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no state action in part because the police officer responded to calls from both the party alleging the deprivation and the alleged dispossessor
• dismissing Due Process Claims due to lack of personal involvement by government defendant
• “Without being able to establish that she had possessory interest in the house, the Plaintiff cannot successfully maintain an unreasonable seizure claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).