Skip to main content
· 10/3/2016

Ostendorp v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

Citations

  • 137 S. Ct. 240
  • 196 L. Ed. 2d 135
  • 85 U.S.L.W. 3144
  • 2016 U.S. LEXIS 5185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the IJ’s finding that applicant would not “have been allowed to leave the country without difficulty if he was as politically active as he claimed” was conjecture and “not a proper basis for a negative credibility finding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.