Skip to main content
· 3/27/1967

Ostendorff v. United States

Citations

  • 386 U.S. 982
  • 87 S. Ct. 1286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the 1980 Deregulation and Monetary Control Act made “check clearing services ... available to all banks”
  • stating that the MCA made “check clearing services . . . available to all banks, regardless of whether or not they were member banks”
  • upholding dismissal of claims against FRBNY, based on state-law agency principles, on grounds that plaintiffs agency theory was inconsistent with federal law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.