· 5/1/1984
Ostendorf v. Kenyon
Citations
- 347 N.W.2d 834
- 1984 Minn. App. LEXIS 3104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- purpose of discretionary function exception is that courts are not an appropriate forum to review and second guess acts of government which involve exercise of judgment
- discretionary acts require balancing of complex and competing factors at planning stage
- discretionary acts require balancing of complex and competing factors at planning stage
- State’s choice of information to place in the Minnesota Driver’s Manual was a discretionary act, but summary judgment was improper because plaintiffs had also raised a material issue of fact as to whether the State had a duty to place more or better warning signs on a particular highway
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Foley, Wozniak, Sedgwick, Popovich, Parker, Lansing
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.