Skip to main content
· 5/1/1984

Ostendorf v. Kenyon

Citations

  • 347 N.W.2d 834
  • 1984 Minn. App. LEXIS 3104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • purpose of discretionary function exception is that courts are not an appropriate forum to review and second guess acts of government which involve exercise of judgment
  • discretionary acts require balancing of complex and competing factors at planning stage
  • discretionary acts require balancing of complex and competing factors at planning stage
  • State’s choice of information to place in the Minnesota Driver’s Manual was a discretionary act, but summary judgment was improper because plaintiffs had also raised a material issue of fact as to whether the State had a duty to place more or better warning signs on a particular highway

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foley, Wozniak, Sedgwick, Popovich, Parker, Lansing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.