Ostendorf v. Clark Equipment Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff may bring a defective design claim under a theory of negligence or strict liability and both theories are premised on the argument the product is unreasonably dangerous
• “[U]nder either theory, it is the legal duty of a manufacturer to use reasonable care to protect against foreseeable dangers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).