Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the daughter of an insured who was injured while crossing to street to get to the vehicle was not “occupying” the vehicle
• requiring interpretation of insurance contracts according to plain meaning of words
• “courts will not redraft insurance policies in order to provide coverage where the plain language of the policy indicates that no coverage exists”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).