O'Steen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Appellant contends that the trial court's revocation of probation was erroneously based on conduct engaged in by appellant prior to his having been placed on probation. We agree.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wilcox v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1981-01-09· cited 37×
• Demchak v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-04-07· cited 19×
• State v. Darrin
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1982-10-27· cited 16×
• Kimble v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-04-08· cited 12×
• Dearing v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-09-16· cited 9×
• Malloy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-02-22· cited 5×
• Wilcox v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1980-05-06· cited 4×
• Rutledge v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-07-28· cited 3×
• Smiley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2009-05-01· cited 2×
• Curry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-07-18· cited 2×
• State v. Loftin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-02-17· cited 2×
• Lachle v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-04-15
• Garcia, Jr. v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-02-14

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Egantoff v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-04-05· cited 16×