· 4/7/1977
O'Steen v. Kemmerer
Citations
- 344 So. 2d 313
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding landowner not liable where an employee's monkey escaped from property and attacked plaintiff off the premises
- absent some special interest or relationship between the landowner and an animal kept on the premises by an occupant, the landowner will not be liable for injuries that the animal causes away from the property
- in which the court refused to extend Christie to a situation in which the plaintiff was injured on her own property by wild animals kept on the landowner’s adjacent property by his employee, absent any interest in or use of the animals by the landowner
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.