O'Steen v. Kemmerer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding landowner not liable where an employee's monkey escaped from property and attacked plaintiff off the premises
• absent some special interest or relationship between the landowner and an animal kept on the premises by an occupant, the landowner will not be liable for injuries that the animal causes away from the property
• in which the court refused to extend Christie to a situation in which the plaintiff was injured on her own property by wild animals kept on the landowner’s adjacent property by his employee, absent any interest in or use of the animals by the landowner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McCullough v. Bozarth
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1989-06-30· cited 26×
• Tran v. Bancroft
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-01-11· cited 15×
• Allen v. Enslow
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-21· cited 11×
• Manucy v. Manucy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-09-21· cited 10×
• Sharp v. Levine
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-08-09· cited 2×
• Sparks v. Kintzing
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-04-01· cited 1×
• Martin v. Gulfstream Metal Plating, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-12

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Christie v. Anchorage Yacht Haven, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-12-28· cited 14×