Skip to main content
· 12/30/1993

Osteen v. Henley

Citations

  • 13 F.3d 221
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claims for damages against NIU were barred by the Eleventh Amendment because NIU is an Illinois state university
  • “We need not decide today at what point informality of disciplinary procedures crosses the line drawn by due process .... ”
  • “[A] violation of state law . . . is not a denial of due process, even if the state law confers a procedural right.”
  • ”More important, the expulsion was only for two years, and the two years are up, so that there is, at least as far as the record dis- closes, no obstacle to his being readmitted.”
  • “As we tirelessly but unavailingly remind counsel in this court, a violation of state law (for purposes of this case the student judicial code may be treated as a state law) is not a denial of due process, even if the state law confers a procedural right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.