O'Steen v. Estate of Wineberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an express trust is not subject to the statute of limitations until it is terminated or openly repudiated by the trustee and that a repudiation, to be effective, must be communicated to the beneficiary
• trust not repudiated based on the trustee’s inventory of the trust’s property, although that may be a sign that the trustee considered the property his own, it was not clear and unequivocal
• “[T]he claim was for a specific percentage of stock in a corporation that William Wineberg held for plaintiffs as a trustee. . . . The nonclaim statute does not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).