Skip to main content
· 10/31/1990

Ospina v. Department of Corrections, State of Del.

Citations

  • 749 F. Supp. 572
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14610
  • 1990 WL 168156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the DOC has not waived Eleventh Amendment immunity
  • “The settled rule in the Third Circuit is that a defendant's right to contribution or indemnity from an absent party does not render that absentee indispensable pursuant to Rule 19.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.