Skip to main content
· 5/11/1999

Osier v. Broome County

Citations

  • 47 F. Supp. 2d 311
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7099
  • 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 611
  • 1999 WL 304683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting defendants’ summary judgment because, inter alia, co-worker’s tailgating of plaintiff's car “occurred outside of work”
  • deeming admitted all facts in defendants' Rule 7.1(a)(3) statement where \plaintiff submitted thirteen pages of purported facts without any indication where those facts can be located in the record\
  • “[The rule is] a simple, straightforward requirement designed to force litigants to focus sharply on the specific factual issues in dispute, and to enable the [c]ourt to move immediately to the gravamen of the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McAVOY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.