Oshode v. DiNapoli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant “present[ed] an arguable basis for asserting a right to possession” because his lease contained “an automatic renewal clause” and because he “challenge[d] the reason underlying the lease’s termination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).