O'Shea v. Lesser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under South Carolina law, a breach of contract action seeking monetary damages is one at law
• holding an action for breach of restrictive covenants was at law, because relief sought was general damages for loss of view and invasion of privacy
• holding an action for breach of restrictive covenants was at law, because relief sought was general damages for loss of view and invasion of privacy
• holding the right to enforce a restrictive covenant is not fiduciary and may be assigned to another
• holding an architectural review board designated by a homeowners’ association did not owe homeowners a fiduciary duty; rather, the review board owed “a duty to exercise judgment reasonably and in good faith”
• the character of an action as legal or equitable depends on the relief sought

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).