Skip to main content
· 8/22/2001

Osgood v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc.

Citations

  • 202 F.R.D. 115
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12807
  • 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,736
  • 2001 WL 950151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the adequate remedies for improper examination to include deposing the examiner or “cross examination at trial to point out the prejudice”
  • “In short, Ms. Morrison has simply presented no evidence that any of the facts and circumstances of this case differ from the ordinary case and require the Court to attach, as a condition to the examination, a directive that a recording device be made available.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orlofsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.