Oseguera v. Lincoln Properties LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a township and “an insurance company is entitled to receive restitution only when it compensates a victim” under the pre-2018 amendments to Section 1106
• stating that Section 11.103 “defines a ‘victim’ as an individual who has been harmed by the offender” and noting that “a government agency is not entitled to restitution because it is [not] an individual victim . . . .”
• vacating guilty plea and remanding for a new trial where restitution was ordered to an improper victim as a result of a negotiated plea agreement
• explaining that publicity must be “inflammatory and slanted toward conviction.”
• “an award of restitution relates to the legality of a sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).