Oscarson v. Office of the Senate Sergeant at Arms

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the sentence was reasonable in part because it was well below the statutory maximum
• concluding that the Johnson principles “apply with equal force” to a claim of federal sovereign immunity
• noting that courts “endeavor, 3 within reasonable limits, to guard against the loss of pro se claims due to technical defects”
• noting the practice to “hold pro se pleadings to less demanding standards than those drafted by lawyers”
• \[D]enials of motions to dismiss are generally not reviewable.\
• qualified immunity is “entirely a judicial creation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).