Oscar v. Simeonidis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “[a]s a basic premise,” no contract is enforceable “without the flow of consideration—both sides must ‘get something’ out of the exchange” (quoting Cont’l Bank of Pa. v. Barclay Riding Acad., Inc., 459 A.2d 1163, 1171 (N.J. 1983)
• “Mutual promises are sufficient consideration one for the other. They are reciprocal considerations for each other.” (quoting Coast Nat’l Bank v. Bloom, 174 A. 576, 579 (N.J. 1934))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).