Oscar Perez v. State of Arkansas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, based “[u]pon careful review of the record,” that there was “no violation of [the appellant’s] Due Process rights”
• holding Article I court’s possess inherent powers based on “the need to control proceedings before such court and the need to protect the exercise of judicial authority in connection with those proceedings”
• “[F]ederal courts have a duty to uphold the Constitution, as the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.” (citing U.S. Const. art. VI, § 2)
• “[T]his court has jurisdiction over any ‘free-standing’ constitutional issue, i.e., one not also involving a challenge to the interpreta- tion or validity of a statute or regulation.”
• non-Article III tribunals have inherent power to control proceedings and enter sanctions
• non-Article III tribunals have inherent authority to control proceedings and enter sanctions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).