Oscar Perez v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on medical records and other evidence of record to support a claim for disability
• relying on the consultative examiner’s opinion on RFC because it was “substantiated,” “detailed and accompanied by specific clinical and laboratory findings,” and “consistent with some of the other evidence of record”
• mere claims of “indifference,” “negligence,” or “medical 4 malpractice” do not support a claim under § 1983

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).