Osborne v. State, Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “reviewing a non-adjudicative proceeding that produced an inadequate record would create an unacceptable risk of violating a prisoner’s fundamental constitutional rights”
• observing that prisoner who failed to successfully challenge his sentence calculation through the DOC grievance process was “not precluded from challenging his sentence calculation in the superior court through an application for post-conviction relief”
• describing missing elements as (1) an evidentiary hearing or similar procedure; (2) the opportunity to examine witnesses; and (3
• converting petition for hearing to appeal and accepting appellant’s filing as opening brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).