Osborne v. Nottley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that declaratory judgment proceeding seeking quiet title was equitable in nature
• “A conveyance designed ‘for the purpose of placing property beyond the reach of creditors’ constitutes inequitable conduct sufficient to bar relief under the unclean hands doctrine.” (Quoting Thompson v. Spint, 247 Or 484, 485, 430 P2d 1014 (1967).

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hughes v. Ephrem
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-16· cited 2×
• Pringle Square, LLC v. Berrey Family, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-08-18

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Pacific Lumber Co. v. Oliver
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-06-19· cited 38×
• Ken Leahy Construction, Inc. v. Cascade General, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-12-30· cited 31×
• Angelini v. Delaney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-09-30· cited 26×
• Moon v. Moon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-04-17· cited 17×
• Merimac Co. v. Portland Timber & Land Holding Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1971-09-10· cited 15×
• Thompson v. Spint
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-08-23· cited 7×
• Damerow Ford Co. v. Bradshaw
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-06-22· cited 6×

Other cases named Osborne v. Nottley

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Osborne v. NOTTLEY
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-10-31· cited 1×