Osborne v. Lord

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where an appellant’s concise statement raises an unduly large number of issues (104 in Kanter), the purpose of Rule 1925 is effectively subverted
• where an appellant’s concise statement raises an unduly large number of issues (104 in Kanter), the purpose of Rule 1925 is effectively subverted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).