Skip to main content
· 9/23/2002

Osborne v. Bank of America, National Ass'n

Citations

  • 234 F. Supp. 2d 804
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20823
  • 2002 WL 31408899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Additionally, plaintiffs have adequately alleged that Bank of America had reasonable notice of the racially discriminatory effects of dealers’ subjective Markups, thereby rendering the Multiple Creditor Rule inapplicable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trauger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.