Osborne & Co. v. Farmers' Machine Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating a tenant at sufferance is not “in a landlord-tenant relationship” and “is not a ‘tenancy in fact’ because there is ‘no privity between [the] landlord and tenant”
• reversing trial court’s determination that owner of property was a landlord because no evidence demonstrated that owner ever rented or leased the occupant’s apartment to her or that owner could have been determined to do so by law
• tenant at sufferance is not “in a landlord-tenant relationship”; it is not a “tenancy in fact” because there is no privity between landlord and tenant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).