Skip to main content
· 11/18/2004

Osborn v. Packard

Citations

  • 117 P.3d 77
  • 2004 Colo. App. LEXIS 2124
  • 2004 WL 2609566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • arbitrator did not exceed his jurisdiction by issuing a clarifying order on party’s timely request after the award was issued
  • a court abuses its discretion if it does not provide a reasonable opportunity for an aggrieved party to be heard
  • “[W]here an ambiguity cannot be resolved by the record, the court must not attempt to interpret the terms. Rather, the matter must be remanded to the arbitrator for clarification.”
  • \The official commentary of the Uniform Arbitration Act on which the Colorado act is modeled clarifies that this section was intended ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rothenberg, Nieto, Loeb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.