Osbon v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “a majority of courts interpret ‘any insured’ as applying to all insureds as defined by the policy”
• holding use of phrase “the insured” is singular and refers only to insured responsible for causing loss
• finding that “the phrase ‘the insured’ refers to a specific insured, namely, the insured who (1) is responsible for causing the loss and (2
• holding intentional acts exclusion precluding recovery by innocent coinsured conflicted with that state’s standard policy despite fact that standard policy did not include intentional acts exclusion, where standard policy utilized phrase “the insured”
• “Courts in other jurisdictions generally focus on the article modifying the word ‘insured,’ specifically, ‘the’ insured, ‘an’ insured, and ‘any’ [J-85-2014] - 11 insured”
• “Courts in other jurisdictions generally focus on the article modifying the word ‘insured,’ specifically, ‘the’ insured, ‘an’ insured, and ‘any’ [J-85-2014] - 11 insured”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).