Seventh Circuit· 9/9/2008
Osagiede v. United States
Citations
- 543 F.3d 399
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19237
- 2008 WL 4140630
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that ineffective assistance claims often require an evidentiary hearing to more fully develop the record
- instructing courts to “accord a liberal construction” to pro se petitions
- “Ineffective assistance claims generally require an evidentiary hearing if the record contains insufficient facts to explain counsel’s actions as tactical.”
- “All lawyers that represent criminal defendants are expected to know the laws applicable to their client’s defense.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
- “All lawyers that represent criminal defendants are expected to know the laws applicable to their client’s defense.”
- “Ineffective assistance claims generally require an evidentiary hearing if the record contains insufficient facts to explain counsel’s actions as tactical.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Ripple, Rovner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sandoval v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2009-07-31· cited 166×
- Hutchings v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2010-08-24· cited 128×
- Leal Garcia v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2009-06-24· cited 128×
- Commonwealth v. ClarkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-06-17· cited 115×
- Troy Martin v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2015-06-12· cited 106×
- Chaidez v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2011-08-23· cited 97×
- Watson v. AnglinSeventh Circuit· 2009-03-30· cited 90×
- United States v. PattersonSeventh Circuit· 2009-08-05· cited 83×
- Jeffery Bridges v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2021-03-17· cited 72×
- Logan Gaylord v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2016-07-12· cited 60×
- Torres-Chavez v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2016-07-07· cited 57×
- McGee v. BartowSeventh Circuit· 2010-01-27· cited 56×
- Monta Anderson v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2020-11-23· cited 37×
- Gilbert Spiller v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2017-04-28· cited 34×
- Gross v. KnightSeventh Circuit· 2009-03-26· cited 25×
- Richard Ambrose v. Zach RoeckemanSeventh Circuit· 2014-04-15· cited 22×
- People v. WardSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2011-09-27· cited 19×
- Anderson v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2017-08-02· cited 17×
- United States v. ChaidezN.D. Illinois· 2010-08-11· cited 15×
- Michael A. Kelley v. Greg ZoellerSeventh Circuit· 2015-08-28· cited 15×
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Hall v. BellmonTenth Circuit· 1991-06-03· cited 5,616×
- Wright v. WestSupreme Court· 1992-06-19· cited 1,604×
- Medellin v. TexasSupreme Court· 2008-03-25· cited 548×
- Wong Wing v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1896-05-18· cited 526×
- Sanchez-Llamas v. OregonSupreme Court· 2006-06-28· cited 451×
- Breard v. PruettFourth Circuit· 1998-01-22· cited 410×
- Breard v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1998-04-21· cited 405×
- Luther K. Barnett, Jr. v. Steve HargettTenth Circuit· 1999-04-16· cited 305×
- United States v. Chucks EmuegbunamSixth Circuit· 2001-10-05· cited 238×
- United States v. ChanthadaraTenth Circuit· 2000-11-01· cited 188×
- United States v. Jose Lombera-CamorlingaNinth Circuit· 2000-03-06· cited 148×
- Ivory v. JacksonSixth Circuit· 2007-11-15· cited 148×
- United States v. David LeontiNinth Circuit· 2003-04-24· cited 146×
- Roger G. Galbraith v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2002-12-19· cited 138×
- Tomkins v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1945-01-08· cited 135×
- Ronald Mason v. Craig A. HanksSeventh Circuit· 1996-08-27· cited 123×
- Rene Rodriguez v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2002-05-21· cited 122×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.