Orvel Winston Lloyd v. Charity Benton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that PLRA did not deprive district court of its original jurisdiction over “three strikes” inmate’s § 1983 action, which had been properly removed by defendants, and thus district court’s remand of action to state court was inappropriate
• noting the district court took “judicial notice of [the prisoner’s] status as a ‘three strikes’ litigant under the PLRA”
• noting the district court took “judicial notice of [the prisoner’s] status as a ‘three strikes’ litigant under the PLRA”
• noting the district court took “judicial notice of [the prisoner’s] status as a ‘three strikes’ litigant under the PLRA”
• noting the district court took “judicial notice of [the prisoner’s] status as a ‘three strikes’ litigant under the PLRA”
• District Court erred under Thermtron when it remanded, on grounds that the remand statutes do not recognize, a case over which it had original jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).