· 8/12/1996
Ortland v. County of Tehama
Citations
- 939 F. Supp. 1465
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11789
- 1996 WL 480686
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]here are two types of legislation where the rule against retroactive legislation is inapplicable. The first is where the statute is an amendment that clarifies existing law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Karlton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.