Skip to main content
· 12/19/2011

Ortiz v. United States

Citations

  • 664 F.3d 1151
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 25076
  • 2011 WL 6306687

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding a district court’s mistaken belief that a defendant obtained a driver’s license was not harmless even though “the driver’s license was but one of many facts upon which the district court relied”
  • emphasizing defendant’s refusal to cooperate in investigative efforts as relevant to determining counsel’s reasonableness
  • rejecting an argument that “established science ... dictates a mental retardation diagnosis” because it “incorrectly assumes the Atkins decision delegates to the scientific community the finding of whether an individual is mentally retarded”
  • “[P]sychology informs, but does not determinately decide, whether an inmate is exempt from execution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Benton, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.