Ortiz v. Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “fundamental fairness” requires a clear, “unambiguous” warning that an employee, whose lateness had been previously tolerated, would be discharged if his poor attendance record continued
• fairness required a waring where employer condoned absenteeism for months but warning not always required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).