Ortiz v. Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that the diminishment of her work portfolio by \80 percent” and her exclusion from \discussions about broad policy” caused her to complain of discrimination
• treating defendant’s argument in motion for summary judgment as conceded where plaintiff failed to address it in his response
• treating defendant’s argument in motion for summary judgment as conceded where plaintiff failed to address it in his response
• “It is well understood in this Circuit that . . . a court may treat [unopposed] arguments [in a dispositive motion] . . . as conceded.”
• “it is well understood … that when a plaintiff files an opposition to a dispositive motion and addresses only certain arguments raised by defendant, a court may treat those arguments that plaintiff failed to address as conceded.”
• “It is well understood in this Circuit that when a plaintiff files an opposition to a dispositive motion and addresses only certain arguments raised by the defendant, a court may treat those arguments that the plaintiff failed to address as conceded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).