Skip to main content
· 3/19/1980

Ortiz v. Great Southern Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 597 S.W.2d 342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that under equitable subrogation, \[a]n insurer is not entitled to subrogation if the insured's loss is in excess of the amounts recovered from the insurer and the third party causing the loss.\
  • acknowledging that a settlement agreement may compensate for damages
  • one reason for granting an insurance company the right of subrogation is to prevent the insured from receiving a double recovery
  • no right to sub-rogation unless insured recovered sum in excess of the amounts recovered from the insurer and the third party causing the loss
  • insurer bears burden of showing what amount, if any, of settlement funds was allocated to covered loss
  • insurer bears burden of showing what amount, if any, of settlement funds was allocated to covered loss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spears

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.