· 3/19/1980
Ortiz v. Great Southern Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
Citations
- 597 S.W.2d 342
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that under equitable subrogation, \[a]n insurer is not entitled to subrogation if the insured's loss is in excess of the amounts recovered from the insurer and the third party causing the loss.\
- acknowledging that a settlement agreement may compensate for damages
- one reason for granting an insurance company the right of subrogation is to prevent the insured from receiving a double recovery
- no right to sub-rogation unless insured recovered sum in excess of the amounts recovered from the insurer and the third party causing the loss
- insurer bears burden of showing what amount, if any, of settlement funds was allocated to covered loss
- insurer bears burden of showing what amount, if any, of settlement funds was allocated to covered loss
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spears
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.