Ortiz v. Avante Villa at Corpus Christi, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he fact that Stephen F. Shaw’s name was misspelled as ‘Sthepen F Shaw’ on the return” was an “extremely minor” error that did not invalidate service
• holding omission of corporate designation from return of service does not invalidate service when citation and attached petition both fully name defendant with proper designation
• holding omission of corporate designation from return of service does not invalidate service when citation and attached petition both fully name defendant with proper designation
• holding return referring to “the Petition attached” to the citation was sufficient where citation identified document served as “the PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION”
• omission of accent mark and of corporate designation and substitution of symbol “@” for word “at” are defects that do not invalidate service
• omission of accent symbol, substitution of symbol “@” for “at,” and omission of “Inc.” did not invalidate service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).