Skip to main content
· 7/13/2009

Ortiz v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc.

Citations

  • 639 F. Supp. 2d 1159
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62496
  • 2009 WL 2058784

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a plaintiff can seek damages, 9 recission, or both under TILA
  • distinguishing bankruptcy cases from this circuit and holding that “non-judicial foreclosures are not ‘actions’ as contemplated by TILA,” and, therefore, rescission may not be asserted defensively in response to non-judicial foreclosures
  • finding section 2923.5 does contain a private right of action, as “the California legislature would not have enacted this urgency’ legislation, intended to curb high foreclosure rates in the state, without any accompanying enforcement mechanism.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jeffrey T. Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.