Skip to main content
· 4/12/2024

Ortiz Leandry, Raul v. Resto Luyando, Jose David

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Article II, Section 10, provides greater protection than the federal constitution's right to privacy
  • concluding that Article II, Section 10, provides greater protection than the federal constitution’s right to privacy
  • examining HIV research contravening state’s assertion that challenged law served government interest in controlling the spread of HIV
  • examining HIV research report and concluding that challenged law did not actually further asserted government interest in controlling the spread of HIV
  • examining evidence regarding whether challenged law actually served the asserted interest in combatting spread of HIV
  • upholding the constitutional right of homosexuals to engage in private, consensual, noncommercial sexual conduct with other adults free of governmental interference or regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.