· 4/12/2024
Ortiz Leandry, Raul v. Resto Luyando, Jose David
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that Article II, Section 10, provides greater protection than the federal constitution's right to privacy
- concluding that Article II, Section 10, provides greater protection than the federal constitution’s right to privacy
- examining HIV research contravening state’s assertion that challenged law served government interest in controlling the spread of HIV
- examining HIV research report and concluding that challenged law did not actually further asserted government interest in controlling the spread of HIV
- examining evidence regarding whether challenged law actually served the asserted interest in combatting spread of HIV
- upholding the constitutional right of homosexuals to engage in private, consensual, noncommercial sexual conduct with other adults free of governmental interference or regulation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.