Orth v. R. B. Park & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegation, inter alia, that accused was made a “scapegoat” to appease the DOE OCR after two previous investigations for inadequately handling sexual assault cases was sufficient to gender bias pursuant to Title IX
• finding that a plaintiff sufficiently stated a claim under Title IX by alleging that the defendant university was trying to use him as a scapegoat to demonstrate the adequacy of its responses to sexual assault allegations
• plaintiff's complaint was sufficient where, taken together, his allegations suggested that university was \reacting against him[ ] as a male\ in response to a Department of Education investigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).