Skip to main content
· 5/22/1961

Ortego v. State ex rel. Department of Highways

Citations

  • 130 So. 2d 432
  • 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1918

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We specifically find unavailing Appellant’s sufficiency argument based on his self-serving version of the events, which the jury was free to disregard.”
  • noting “a prosecutor has considerable latitude during closing arguments”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Culpep, Culpepper, Hood, Tate

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.