Skip to main content

Ortega v. State

Citations

  • 171 S.W.3d 895
  • 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1344
  • 2005 WL 2218404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the proper double jeopardy inquiry is to look solely to the statutory elements of the offenses to determine if they are the same
  • holding that court of appeals erred by employing “same conduct” analysis
  • holding that court of appeals erred by employing \same conduct\ analysis
  • recognizing overturning of Grady, and reversing court of appeals which had relied on its logic to find double jeopardy violation
  • concluding appellant’s prior conviction for resisting arrest and later conviction for assault arising from the same conduct did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause because each offense required proof of at least one fact that the other did not
  • holding offenses of assault on a public servant and resisting arrest were not the same for double jeopardy purposes because they each required proof of at least one fact that the other did not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack, Keller, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Price, Cochran, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.