Ortega Rock Quarry v. Golden Eagle Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• simply stating that \state and federal environmental laws may provide insight into the scope of the policies' definition of pollutants [in an exclusion clause] without being specifically incorporated in those definitions\
• “[H]azardous substances are not rendered non-polluting by the fact that they are naturally occurring . . . .” (quoting Gold Fields Am. Corp. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 744 N.Y.S. 2d 395, 396 (2002))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).