Ortega-Cervantes v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a noncitizen released on an “Order of Release on Recognizance” 13 pursuant to INA § 236 “was conditionally paroled under the authority of § 1226(a)”
• holding that a noncitizen released on an “Order of Release on Recognizance” necessarily must have been detained and released under § 1226, including because he was not an “arriving alien” under the regulations governing § 1225 examinations
• holding that a noncitizen released on an “Order of Release on Recognizance” necessarily must have been detained and released under § 1226, including because he was not an “arriving alien” under the regulations governing § 1225 examinations
• holding that a noncitizen released on an “Order of Release on Recognizance” necessarily must have been detained and released under § 1226, including because he was not an “arriving alien” under the regulations governing § 1225 examinations
• holding that “conditional parole” under § 1226(a)(2)(B
• recognizing court generally lacks jurisdiction to review discretionary denial of adjustment of status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).