· 3/29/2006
Orris Bowles v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Citations
- 443 F.3d 671
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 7654
- 87 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,312
- 97 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1305
- 2006 WL 783378
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that three weeks gave the defendant “adequate time to conform its defense to the plaintiff’s announced objectives”
- finding a discovery request into defendant’s net worth submitted three months before trial provided sufficient notice that plaintiff would seek punitive damages
- affirming award of punitive damages in a hostile work environment case pursuant to Rule 54(c) despite not being requested in the complaint
- award of punitive damages was proper when defendants were notified three weeks in advance of trial of plaintiff’s intention to seek punitive damages
- “[T]here have been cases in which punitive damages have been properly awarded when merited even in the absence of their being sought after or prayed for by a party.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Lay, Wollman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.