Skip to main content
· 3/29/2006

Orris Bowles v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 443 F.3d 671
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 7654
  • 87 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,312
  • 97 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1305
  • 2006 WL 783378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that three weeks gave the defendant “adequate time to conform its defense to the plaintiff’s announced objectives”
  • finding a discovery request into defendant’s net worth submitted three months before trial provided sufficient notice that plaintiff would seek punitive damages
  • affirming award of punitive damages in a hostile work environment case pursuant to Rule 54(c) despite not being requested in the complaint
  • award of punitive damages was proper when defendants were notified three weeks in advance of trial of plaintiff’s intention to seek punitive damages
  • “[T]here have been cases in which punitive damages have been properly awarded when merited even in the absence of their being sought after or prayed for by a party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Lay, Wollman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.