Orrick v. Durham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the language of the contract identifying the construction plan as a “project” was a factor indicating an agreement for the provision of services
• noting that when a trial court reaches the correct result, but on mistaken grounds, this court will sustain the decision if there are valid alternative grounds to support it
• upholding trial court reaching correct result, but on mistaken grounds, where there are valid alternative grounds to support decision
• upholding trial court reaching correct result, but on mistaken grounds, where there were valid alternative grounds to support decision
• affirming trial court that used faulty logic but reached correct result
• “Because the agreement is a contract for services, the UCC does not govern this dispute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).